Min menu

Pages

Clock is ticking on health care reform


President Barack Obama will address a joint session of Congress on health care legislation Wednesday night. Here, he walks through the West Wing colonnade before addressing reporters on Sept. 1, 2009.
President Barack Obama will address a joint session of Congress on health care legislation Wednesday night. Here, he walks through the West Wing colonnade before addressing reporters on Sept. 1, 2009. (AP)
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

WASHINGTON — The patient isn't dead yet.

But with a few more months of wrangling and indecision, health care legislation to remedy America's coverage and costs problem could be drawing its last gasps.

As Congress returns to work this week, President Barack Obama and lawmakers have three broad options — competing treatment plans for a patient whose vital signs are growing weak. It's not clear which one, if any, will work.

Democrats — and liberals in particular — want heroic measures and large-scale intervention. They think the legislation needs big new ideas such as a public insurance plan that would have the government offering coverage to middle-class workers and their families.


Republicans want a conservative treatment to relieve the worst symptoms of America's health care malaise. They're proposing help for small-business owners and the self-employed, and some GOP lawmakers probably could go along with expanding current programs that cover the poorest of the poor. But they do not support any new government plan or guarantees that everyone would be covered.

A third group, including moderates from both parties, supports a holistic approach that would put the country on track to coverage for all. They believe that government should help some middle-class people through subsidies for private coverage, but that a federal insurance plan isn't needed. Some are willing to include malpractice changes that appeal to conservatives.

Obama will say which way he wants to go when he addresses a joint session of Congress on Wednesday night.

Above all, the president wants to avoid failure. But an argument on the merits may fail to persuade lawmakers polarized by the town hall brawls of August.

If nothing gets done, "it's a disaster politically" for the Democrats, said Gerald Shea, the AFL-CIO's top health care policy expert. "Unfortunately, I think that's what's behind a lot of the Republican opposition."

The action will speed up once Congress is back.

The chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, Sen. Max Baucus, says he's ready to march ahead. For months, Baucus, D-Mont., has tried to reach a compromise within a small but influential group of senators from both parties. He faces a Sept. 15 deadline, and has signaled he'll move with or without a deal.

His committee would be the last one to consider health care legislation before the full House and Senate take over. Deliberations in the Finance Committee are seen as a critical test because it reflects the composition of the Senate as a whole.

In the House, Democratic leaders have indicated they will not schedule a vote until the end of this month. Many House members don't want to stick their necks out if it looks as if the Senate is hopelessly deadlocked. Still, once House Democrats decide to go forward, they should be able to pass their bill.

There won't be any guarantees in the Senate, where 60 votes are needed to pass legislation of any consequence. It doesn't look as if Democrats have them right now.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., will try to meld the Finance Committee's bill with legislation written by liberals on the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee before he takes something to the full Senate. Debate could last for weeks, with hundreds of amendments.

Reid's most important decision will be whether to use a maneuver that allows the Senate to pass the financing elements of the bill with just a simple majority. Even so, he'd probably still need 60 votes to pass companion legislation with other essential elements — such as how people would buy their health insurance.

The shortcut strategy could backfire politically. Sen. Ben Nelson, D-Neb., said Sunday that his constituents are already concerned that Congress is rushing things. "If we went to some sort of a parliamentary shortcut, I think they would be even more alarmed than they are right now," Nelson told CNN's "State of the Union."

Even if the legislation clears every hurdle, it could be Christmas before it reaches Obama's desk.

Republicans say Congress should scrap what's been done so far and start over, without deadlines.
Source